Switching schemes for multiple antennas

ABSTRACT

Signals from multiple antennas are evaluated in a wireless device having one receiver chain and the antenna receiving the highest quality signals is selected. The signal quality from the multiple antennas may be evaluated using the short symbols in the preamble or the beacon signals and the antennas dynamically selected to improve the performance of the wireless communications device.

Today's portable communication products such as cellular telephones and laptop computers require reception of an accurate data stream for effective operation. The signal received by two antennas on a Network Interface Card (NIC) may be sequentially evaluated, with the antenna supplying the best signal quality selected to further receive data. Thus, the NIC may be used to evaluate signals received through two antennas and based on the evaluation, lock onto the signal with the best quality. This capability of selection is referred to as “switched diversity” and provides signal gain over a product that does not provide signal quality selection in combating signal fading.

It would be advantageous to have an improved method and circuit for evaluating signals from multiple antennas and selecting the signal with the desired signal qualities.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The subject matter regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. The invention, however, both as to organization and method of operation, together with objects, features, and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates a wireless communications device having features for evaluating and selecting signals received from multiple antennas in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 2 illustrates a scheme for dynamically tracking the channel variation that affects the signals received by the multiple antennas;

FIG. 3 illustrates the evaluation process for selecting antennas that provide the wireless communications device with the highest performance;

FIG. 4 illustrates another embodiment that dynamically tracks channel variations that may affect the signals received by the multiple antennas;

FIG. 5 illustrates yet another embodiment that dynamically tracks channel variations that may affect the signals received by the multiple antennas; and

FIG. 6 illustrates a procedure for initiating coverage or booting up the wireless communications device.

It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements illustrated in the figures have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements are exaggerated relative to other elements for clarity.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components and circuits have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the present invention.

In the following description and claims, the terms “coupled” and “connected,” along with their derivatives, may be used. It should be understood that these terms are not intended as synonyms for each other. Rather, in particular embodiments, “connected” may be used to indicate that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact with each other. “Coupled” may mean that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact. However, “coupled” may also mean that two or more elements are not in direct contact with each other, but yet still co-operate or interact with each other.

Embodiments of the present invention may be used in a variety of applications, with the claimed subject matter incorporated into microcontrollers, general-purpose microprocessors, Digital Signal Processors (DSPs), Reduced Instruction-Set Computing (RISC), Complex Instruction-Set Computing (CISC), among other electronic components. In particular, the present invention may be used in laptop computers, smart phones, communicators and Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs), medical or biotech equipment, automotive safety and protective equipment, and automotive infotainment products. However, it should be understood that the scope of the present invention is not limited to these examples.

FIG. 1 illustrates a wireless communications device 10 having features for evaluating and selecting signals received from multiple antennas in accordance with the present invention. In this device the transceiver receives and transmits modulated signals from four sectored antennas 14, 16, 18 and 20, although the number of antenna is not a limitation of the present invention. The receiver chain may include amplifiers such as, for example, Low Noise Amplifiers (LNAs) and Variable Gain Amplifiers (VGAs) to amplify signals received from the selected antenna. Then, a mixer circuit receives the modulated signals and down-converts the carrier frequency of the modulated signals. The down-converted signals may then be filtered and converted to a digital representation by Analog-To-Digital Converters (ADCs).

A baseband processor 24 may be connected to the ADC to provide, in general, the digital processing of the received data within communications device 10. Baseband processor 24 may process the digitized quadrature signals, i.e., the in-phase “I” signal and the quadrature “Q” signal from the receiver chain. On the transmitter side, transmitter 22 may receive digital data processed by baseband processor 24 and use the Digital-to-Analog Converter (DAC) to convert the digital data to analog signals for transmission from multiple antennas 14, 16, 18 and 20. Note that receiver 12 and/or transmitter 22 may be embedded with baseband processor 24 as a mixed-mode integrated circuit, or alternatively, the transceiver may be a stand-alone Radio Frequency (RF) integrated circuit.

An applications processor 28 may be connected to baseband processor 24 through a signaling interface 30 that allows data to be transferred between baseband processor 24 and applications processor 28. A memory device 26 may be connected to baseband processor 24 and applications processor 28 to store data and/or instructions. In some embodiments, memory device 26 may be a volatile memory such as, for example, a Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), a Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) or a Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (SDRAM), although the scope of the claimed subject matter is not limited in this respect. In alternate embodiments, the memory devices may be nonvolatile memories such as, for example, an Electrically Programmable Read-Only Memory (EPROM), an Electrically Erasable and Programmable Read Only Memory (EEPROM), a flash memory (NAND or NOR type, including multiple bits per cell), a Ferroelectric Random Access Memory (FRAM), a Polymer Ferroelectric Random Access Memory (PFRAM), a Magnetic Random Access Memory (MRAM), an Ovonics Unified Memory (OUM), a disk memory such as, for example, an electromechanical hard disk, an optical disk, a magnetic disk, or any other device capable of storing instructions and/or data. However, it should be understood that the scope of the present invention is not limited to these examples.

A channel evaluation circuit 34 evaluates the signal qualities of the signals received by the multiple antennas and processed in the receiver chain and sets priorities to select the signals having the best quality. Although channel evaluation circuit 34 is shown in FIG. 1 as receiving a digital input, it should be noted that an analog signal from the receiver chain may alternatively be used without changing the scope of the invention. A switch controller 32 receives the selection criteria from the channel evaluation circuit 34 and controls a switch 36 to lock onto the antenna that provides the best signal quality. The evaluation and selection scheme dynamically improves the performance of wireless communications device 10.

FIG. 2 illustrates a scheme for dynamically tracking the channel variation that affects the signals received by the multiple antennas in receiver 12. For simplicity of illustration and by way of example, signals from the four antennas A₀, A₁, A₂ and A₃ may be evaluated, but it should be pointed out that features of the present invention allow signals from any number of antennas to be evaluated.

To initiate a high-speed wireless Internet connection, laptop computers or other portable devices with Wi-Fi cards (or wireless fidelity) may tap into wireless Access Points (APs) which may be physically connected to high-speed networks. The AP may then transmit frames between network points as a unit complete with the addressing and protocol control information.

The frame is usually transmitted serially and contains a header field and a trailer field that “frame” the data. Part of the frame that is transmitted by an 802.11 WLAN device is called the preamble, with differing preamble formats for the various protocols. For instance, the preamble for an 802.11 a device comprises ten short and two long symbols used for synchronization and may contain data pertinent to signal detection such as Automatic Gain Control (AGC), diversity selection, frequency offset estimation, timing synchronization, etc. It should be noted that the preamble for other 802.11 devices such as 802.11b and 802.11g is different from that of an 802.11a device. For instance, 802.11b does not include short symbols in the preamble training sequence.

In accordance with the present invention, the preamble transmitted by any 802.11 WLAN device has a further use by wireless communications device 10.

Additionally, the preamble may be used to verify the relative quality of signals received by the multiple antennas. In other words, the present invention may be applied to all 802.11 protocols including the most popular ones, i.e., 802.11b, 802.11a, 802.11g and 802.11n. The preamble as a whole, no matter whether repeating or not, may be subdivided and individual portions used by the different antennas. Thus, the subdivided preamble portions for any 802.11 protocol may be used for training wireless communications device 10.

The antenna selection scheme illustrates the dynamic selection and antenna priority process that enables wireless communications device 10 to process signals having the highest quality. By way of example, the four antennas A₀, A₁, A₂ and A₃ may be partitioned into two groups, with one group including antennas A₀ and A₂ and the other group including antennas A₁ and A₃. With the arrival of the first portion of the preamble, receiver 12 sequentially evaluates the signals received by the antennas in the first group during the training period. By way of example, antenna A₀ may use the first 5.5 symbols and antenna A₂ may use the subsequent 1.8 symbols. Then, with the arrival of the each symbol, receiver 12 sequentially evaluates the signals received from antennas in the second group during the second short training symbol.

A comparison of the signals received by the first group may show the signal received by antenna A₀, for example, to be the highest quality. A comparison of the signals received by the second group may show the signal received by antenna A₁, for example, to be the highest quality. Then, a further comparison between the highest rated signals and corresponding antennas from the first and second groups may show, for example, that the signal received by antenna A₀ to be the highest quality. Accordingly, antenna A₀ may be selected for the “first tier group” with the other antennas placed in the “second tier group.”

Thus, in this embodiment channel evaluation circuit 34 (see FIG. 1) evaluates signals received by all of the antennas, selecting the one antenna that provides the highest quality signal for the “first tier group” and holding all other antennas in the “second tier group.” As subsequent preamble packets are received, switch controller 32 “pairs” the one antenna in the “first tier group” with an antenna selected from the “second tier group”. With the arrival of each preamble packet, channel evaluation circuit 34 pairs the one antenna with a different antenna selected from the “second tier group” to determine the antenna combination that provides wireless communications device 10 with the highest performance.

By pairing the one antenna from the “first tier group” in sequential fashion with an antenna selected from the “second tier group”, the antennas and antenna combinations may be evaluated. Based on the evaluations, a determination may be made as to whether the antenna in the “first tier group” should be replaced with an antenna from the “second tier group” if that antenna provides a higher quality signal. By way of example, antenna A₀ in position 0 may be exchanged with antenna A₁ in position 1. In this case, antenna A₁ in position 0 is the one antenna in the “first tier group” that is combined with antenna selected from the “second tier group” for evaluation.

It should be pointed out that the scheme illustrated in FIG. 2 for dynamically tracking the channel variation may be generalized to evaluate more than two antennas for each preambled packet. This may be very useful for 802.11b that has longer preambles that may be used by wireless communications device 10 to support additional antenna evaluations. One modification from the illustrated scheme may include selecting M-1 antennas in the second tier group (instead of selecting the one antenna as shown). With longer preambles receiver 12 is capable of evaluating M antennas for each preambled packet. By way of example, receiver 12 may select antennas at positions mod(i, N-1)+1, . . . , mod(i+M-1,N-1)+1 for evaluation during the current preambled packet and set i=mod(i+M-1,N-1)+1 for the next preambled packet.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the evaluation process for the scheme illustrated in FIG. 2 for selecting two antennas to provide wireless communications device 10 with the highest performance. In this process the one antenna in position 0 from the “first tier group” is evaluated (Block 210). An antenna from the “second tier group”, i.e., an antenna in position 1, 2, 3, . . . , or N-1, is selected for evaluation (Block 212).

Following the evaluation and comparison of the two antennas, the antenna with the best signal quality is selected and a determination made as to whether the packet is detected (Block 214). If the packet is not detected, the signals from the antenna are evaluated again.

On the other hand, if the packet is detected a determination is made about the relative signal quality of the one antenna in position 0 and the paired antenna from the “second tier group” (Block 216). If the antenna in the “first tier group” has the best signal quality, switch controller 32 (see FIG. 1) selects the signal from the antenna in “first tier group” for processing through receiver 12 in decoding the received message (Block 218). The address in the packet sent by the AP is verified (Block 220), and if valid, the one antenna in position 0 from the “first tier group” is paired with another antenna from the “second tier group” (Block 228) to start the evaluation process for the next packet.

Returning to Block 216, if the antenna in the “first tier group” does not have the best signal quality, switch controller 32 (see FIG. 1) selects the signal from the paired antenna in “second tier group” for processing through receiver 12 in decoding the received message (Block 222). The address in the packet sent by the AP is verified (Block 224), and if valid, the paired antenna from the “second tier group” is exchanged with the antenna from the “first tier group” (Block 226). Again, the antenna providing the highest quality signal is placed in position 0 in the “first tier group”. The antenna in position 0 is paired with an antenna from the “second tier group” (Block 228) to start the evaluation process for the next packet.

The antenna receiving the signal having the highest quality is detected within three packets and that antenna is selected and employed to receive further packets. Thus, this scheme dynamically determines the best antenna from all other antennas and directs switch controller 32 to actively receive further packets from that antenna.

FIG. 4 illustrates another embodiment that dynamically tracks channel variations that may affect the signals received by the multiple antennas in receiver 12. This embodiment includes at least two antennas in the “first tier group”, with antennas being placed in this group based on a higher probability of receiving quality signals. For the example where wireless communications device 10 includes four antennas, two antennas (e.g., antennas A₀ and A₂) are placed in the “first tier group” and two antennas (e.g., antennas A₁ and A₃) are placed in the “second tier group”. A comparison “a” between antennas A₀ and A₂ is more frequent than comparisons “b” or “c” because antennas A₀ and A₂ have been evaluated as the most likely candidates to provide the highest quality signals.

Various comparison sequences are possible. One example is a sequence of comparisons a, b, a, c, followed by a repeat of the sequence. Another example is sequence of comparisons a, a, b, a, a, c, followed by a repeat of the sequence. For any comparison sequence, antenna may exchange groups in order to maintain the “first tier group” as the antennas with the higher probability of receiving quality signals. Thus, after each comparison the antennas may be repositioned to maintain antenna in the proper tier groups.

FIG. 5 illustrates a comparison scheme for yet another embodiment that dynamically tracks channel variations that may affect the signals received by the multiple antennas in receiver 12. This embodiment includes more antennas in the “first tier group” than in the “second tier group.” The antenna partitioning for this embodiment may be suited, for example, a Line-Of-Sight (LOS) situation where one sector has the best signal and two neighboring sectors have the second/third best channels. At least these three antennas would be placed in the “first tier group” based on a higher probability of receiving quality signals. Antenna for other antenna sectors would be placed in the “second tier group.”

Various comparison sequences are again possible. One example is a sequence of comparisons a, b, a, b, c, followed by a repeat of the sequence. Another example is sequence of comparisons a, b, a, b, a, b, c, followed by a repeat of the sequence. The comparison sequences are intended to increase the likelihood of choosing the antenna that provides the best quality signal. For any comparison sequence, antenna may exchange groups in order to maintain the “first tier group” as the antennas with the higher probability of receiving quality signals. Thus, after each comparison the antennas may be repositioned to maintain antenna in the proper tier groups.

FIG. 6 illustrates a procedure for initiating coverage or booting up wireless communications device 10. Channel evaluation circuit 34 and switch controller 32 direct switch 36 to rotate or cycle through the multiple antennas until detecting a packet (Block 610). The message is decoded (Block 620) by processor 24 and checked for a correct address from the AP (Block 630). The antenna that provided the packet is placed in position 0, i.e., indicating the highest priority for receiving a quality signal, and other antenna are placed in other positions (Block 640). One of the schemes used to evaluate and compare signals is selected by processor 24 and made operational in wireless communications device 10 (Block 650).

By now it should be apparent that a method and circuitry have been presented for incorporating multiple antenna with one receiver chain and selecting the antenna that provide the highest quality signals to the processor. The signal quality may be evaluated using the preamble or the beacon signals to ensure that the wireless device receives the best quality signals possible.

While certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications, substitutions, changes, and equivalents will now occur to those skilled in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention. 

1. A method, comprising: receiving a preamble by multiple antennas; and sequentially evaluating signals from the multiple antennas to ascertain an antenna providing a higher signal quality than other antennas, wherein the evaluation is based on symbols in the preamble.
 2. The method of claim 1 wherein receiving the preamble further comprises: receiving a frame that is transmitted by an 802.11 station, where the frame includes the preamble which contains a known training sequence.
 3. The method of claim 1 wherein sequentially evaluating signals from the multiple antennas further comprises: demodulating the signals in a single receiver chain to generate quadrature signals; and comparing the quadrature signals to determine which of the multiple antennas provides the higher signal quality.
 4. The method of claim 1 wherein receiving a preamble by multiple antennas further includes receiving the preamble by at least three antenna.
 5. The method of claim 1 further including: comparing the antenna having the higher signal quality with the other antennas, one by one, to dynamically determine the antenna having the higher signal quality.
 6. The method of claim 1 further including: incorporating the multiple antennas with a single receive chain on a Network Interface Card (NIC).
 7. The method of claim 1 further including: selecting one of the other antennas when the signal quality of that antenna is higher than the other antenna.
 8. A method, comprising: controlling a switch to sequentially evaluate signals received by at least three antennas in a single receiver chain where the signals are symbols in a preamble used to evaluate signal quality.
 9. The method of claim 8 further comprising: evaluating the signals received by the at least three antennas to compare the at least three antennas as to the signal quality.
 10. The method of claim 9 wherein evaluating the signals further comprises: comparing a first signal received by a first antenna with a second signal received by a second antenna to select the antenna that provides the higher signal quality.
 11. The method of claim 9 further comprising: placing the at least three antennas into a first tier group and a second tier group in accordance with the signal quality.
 12. The method of claim 11 further comprising: comparing signals from one antenna in the first tier group with signals sequentially selected from antenna in the second tier group to determine which antenna has the higher signal quality.
 13. The method of claim 11 further comprising: exchanging antenna in the first tier group with antenna in the second tier group based on comparing signals, wherein the first tier group has antenna that provide a higher signal quality.
 14. The method of claim 13 further including: verifying an address in a packet.
 15. A system comprising: a Network Interface Card (NIC) having at least three antennas coupled through a switch to a single receiver chain; and a processor coupled to the single receiver chain to compare quadrature signals that are demodulated from preamble symbols sequentially received by the at least three antennas, wherein the processor selects an antenna that provides a highest quality signal.
 16. The system of claim 15, wherein the preamble signal is received from an 802.11a/b station and the preamble signal includes ten short and two long symbols.
 17. The system of claim 15 further including: a Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) coupled to the processor.
 18. The system of claim 15 wherein some of the at least three antenna are placed in a first tier group and others in a second tier group based on the highest quality signal. 